Below is what her attorney is guilty of and have been told by my attorneys to wait to turn him into the bar, because they keep extending the restraining order.
Criminal Contempt -
Letter dated December 9th, Opposition attorney is making a good faith statement to his charges, Stating That He's Telling The Truth) in the viewed legal documents sent to me and further, on what grounds he thinks his demands be granted however, the lying a twisting facts around even though he's stating everything as truth and so, he needs to be confronted on these issues by my Attorneys. This could be criminal contempt of court against him if proved.
Co-Conspirator -
This Opposition is acting in the capacity of being a co-conspirator in acting against the courts order concerning the wife's residence in a given location, staying within the courts outline for visitation and concealing the wife’s real location and activities etc - Have my attorney's DEMAND all evidence that lead to EACH continuance of the restraining order, it appears everything is based on here-say and possibly manufactured evidence due to husband wanting to divorce the wife. Opposition states that I knew of the relocation, and approved it, in Florida, you have to give a written consent to move and location of the child shall be known. It appears the opposition is a co-conspirator and aiding in hiding the wife's whereabouts and child.
Coercion -
Opposition has manipulated, lead, coerced his client into filing a counter-suit, has withheld vital documents (such as divorce dismissal) and so-called evidence from my Attorneys and client. Constantly attempts to use scare tactic in a effort to manipulate me into doing things not beneficial to him. Uses the child as incentive to bait me, into actions not advantages to his emotional or financial well being.
Lying To Police -Opposition lied to authorities and tried to prevent me from filing a police report which is his legal right. Opposition supposedly stated to Coral Springs Police, with the wife that "I knew she is in California and where she is". Also telling officers not to go through with it, because it is a civil matter. Opposition even declared this as true in the letter to my attorney. The police informed me that the wife repeated to the officers that I was physical to her and awaiting charges" This is impeding an investigation, and appears opposition is showing a pattern. I Am also under the impression that on a deposition, Wife repeated "my attorney told me to file charges with the state" You may want to have my attorneys RESEARCH how many of wifes attorneys cases are similar. There is an obvious pattern with opposing counsel, and looks as though opposing counsel is an opportunist. Have my attorneys question DCF and this Officer ________, we may find that opposition has been in constant contact with authorities to deter "due process" against me. When I called 911 to report wife's alleged drinking, the officer told I that this is a civil matter and to settle it in court. This is odd because I was told this at the police station a week ago. It appears opposition attorney is interfering with investigations and when the wife is in trouble, opposition contacts the authorities to cover for wife's behavior, is there a possible romantic involvement between the wife and opposing counsel? Why else would an attorney take a case on contingent ?
Interference Of Due Process -
The opposition Attorney has interfered with the due process of court in this matter of divorce on several occasions, Has asked me not to communicate with the wife against the court order to which states otherwise, has impeded the re-conciliation of this union through withholding vital documents (dismissal of divorce) and alleged evidence from the wife. Opposition inflamed and possibly thwarted any efforts of me and wife getting back together through his TAMPERING of court documents and manipulative practices regarding all concerned. She's after money and opposition is using these charges to extort payment of his legal fees from me.
Documented Lies/Letters To Court -
Opposition, is saying that I could have paid the support very easily now and in the past. NOT TRUE, as his income shows. I have incurred many legal and living expense fees. The wife and her Attorney have caused me financial hardships through their questionable legal antics In this filing.
Opposition is stating that I withheld support payment willfully, But my effort of payment shows on record, and then the loan to catch up the payments entirely, Opposition is lying here. Opposition is also trying to delay the case on the grounds mentioned above and or, to get more time to gather evidence against me or possibly manufacture evidence. Opposition may be trying to gather more evidence against me to which opposition has all ready had a year and a half to do as I would bring up to the court. He hasn't come up with anything yet and he won't, just trying to waste the courts time. Have my attorney's question any evidence if there is any, something tells me if anything it could be manufactured evidence, too much time has passed.
Harassing Filings
The Opposition attorney and his client are filing this motion and amendment for relocation to cause visitation and financial hardships to me and moreover, to take flight from the influence of the jurisdictional court handling this case. Opposition attorney is all ready filing motions without wife knowing or written consent, not lawful as far as I know, but may be different in the State Of Florida.
Oppositions Claiming "FACT"
Her Attorney is stating that both husband and wife were going to move to California at one time and that she wants to be closer to her family. ( SHE WANTS TO BE CLOSER TO HER FAMILY) period, and not because of the lack of my support. I have done everything to support her both financially and emotionally throughout this case, or over the last year plus that's been within his power to give. If I recall, I can not stand California, and doubt he would ever entertain that State? Again this is a documented lie in which opposition is stating as FACT, without evidence. -Hold her attorney to his nonsense and don't let up. Have him prove all of his "facts" in his harassing letters over the past 2 years.
Unlawful Surveillance -
Wife is attempting to use electronic devices, or to utilize forms unlawful surveillance in obtaining enter some coerced statement into evidence concerning anything that I might say over a recorder, telephone, email or through texting, to which is illegal according to Florida state law, (felony) and United States Codes, Title 18, Section 2510 (2)
Apparently opposition has nothing and may be manufacturing recordings of me. I have stated on multiple occasions that wife tries to get him to admit things so he won't go to jail, and wife relays that "If you admit it to my attorney, our attorneys can work together to make sure you don't go to jail" This is illegal and if her attorney put her up to these 3 different conversations I would have my attorneys file against her and opposition immediately. Opposition's client already admitted that her attorney told her to place charges in the first place on a recorded deposition under oath. Opposition may be using scare tactics on her as well as me. Wife may be an innocent victim of opposing counsel's manipulation. Wife relayed to husband 6 months ago that her attorney did not want them to communicate otherwise she would go to jail. Opposition is INTENTIONALLY impeding communication.
Wife tries to constantly lead, bait and or entrap me into admitting to something he didn't do in the first place, Why? in a effort to gain some type of leverage in the court system concerning this disillusionment of marriage case, to pressure me into yielding something that will solely benefit her and moreover, to cause detriment to me in the long run concerning finance and visitation. If opposition is coaxing the wife into this, it can be a criminal charge.
Child Visitations -
Oppositions is untruthful concerning his statement regarding the child’s visitation. All lies, distortions, twisting and over all nonsense, and I didn't give his wife expressed or written permission in any way, shape, or form to remove the child across state lines the second time around.
Power Of Attorney -
Opposition is stating that the wife isn't present and can't sign for this court action and so, she has given her verbal permission over the phone, letter or otherwise to carry out legal task in her behalf by filing for this particular amendment to relocate. I'd question the legitimacy of this action, this shows that she's not in town, she can't show up for court dates, can't personally sign for court documents, can't follow the court orders concerning child visitation etc.
In closing it appears from the documents and letters I have reviewed that, opposition is pushing for divorce, and antagonizing both clients once they are on talking terms.
Have my attorney show communication, and texts, and when the communications break down, it is apparent opposing counsel is at the heart of it.
